Bible Study, Biblical Sovereign, God's Chosen People, God's Law, Secession, STATISM IS IDOLATRY, YHWH’s Chosen People Early Church Fathers Were Historicist – Methods of Interpretation 04/17/2014 admin 2 Comments Article Here play hr.1 —right click to download— play hr.2 Join us live Wed @ 9am PT, noon ET ProphecyRealityTV for interview email email@example.com Share this:TweetTelegramEmailMorePocketShare on TumblrPrintWhatsAppLike this:Like Loading... Related
2 thoughts on “Early Church Fathers Were Historicist – Methods of Interpretation”
Are the writings of the early church fathers equal to the Scriptures?
Are the writings of Tertullian 140-230, Cyprain 200-258, Chrysostom 344-407, Augustine 354-430 the literal , God breathed, word from God the Father? No they are not, if their writings were the inerrant word of God then they would be included in the 66 books of the Bible.
The writing of the early church fathers are no more the inerrant word of God then are the writings of John Calvin, Martin Luther, Max Lucado, Robert Schuller, Billy Graham, John Knox, Benny Hinn, Joesph Smith, Alexander Campbell, or Mary Baker Eddy.
REMEMBER SATAN WANTS YOU DRY OR HE WANTS YOU TO DENY WATER IMMERSION IS ESSENTIAL FOR THE FORGIVENESS OF SINS. HE WANTS YOU TO SPRINKLE NON-BELIEVING INFANTS FOR NON-EXISTENT ORIGINAL SIN.
When, what the early church fathers said was in agreement with God’s written word, it was true.
If you believe what the early church fathers wrote was authoritative, factual, trustworthy, and reliable, then, why not believe what they said even if it is at odds with your denominational catechisms and creed books?
THE BIBLE AND THE BIBLE ALONE SHOULD BE YOUR STANDARD FOR THE TRUTH!
I agree, and have stated nothing contrary.