The Mass or the Lord’s Supper?

The next point was whether the institution of the Lord’s Supper had been changed, and lawfully so?

The disputant on the Papal side admitted that Christ had instituted all the Sacraments, and imparted to them their virtue and efficacy, which virtue and efficacy were the justifying grace, of man.[1] The essentials of the Sacrament came from Christ, but there were accessories of words and gestures and ceremonies necessary to excite due reverence for the Sacrament, both on the part of him who dispenses and of him who receives it. These, Doctor Gallus affirmed, had their source either from the apostles or from the primitive Church, and were to be observed by all Christians. Thus the mass remains as instituted by the Church, with significant rites and decent dresses.

“The Word of God,” replied Olaf, “endures for ever; but,” he added, “we are forbidden either to add to it or take away from it. Hence it follows that the Lord’s Supper having been, as Doctor Gallus has admitted, instituted by Christ, is to be observed not otherwise than as He has appointed. The whole Sacrament — as well its mode of celebration as its essentials — is of Christ, and not to be changed” He quoted the words of institution, “This is my body” — “take eat;” “this cup is the New Testament in my blood” — “drink ye all of it,” &c. “ Seeing,” said he, “Doctor Gallus concedes that the essentials of a Sacrament are not to be changed, and seeing in these words we have the essentials of the Lord’s Supper, why has the Pope changed them? Who gave him power to separate the cup from the bread? If he should say the blood is in the body, I reply, this violates the institution of Christ, Who is wiser than all Popes and bishops.

Did Christ command the Lord’s Supper to be dispensed differently to the clergy and to the laity? Besides, by what authority has the Pope changed the Sacrament into a sacrifice! Christ does not say, ‘Take and sacrifice’ but, ‘Take and eat.’ The offering of Christ’s sacrifice once for all made a full propitiation. The Papal priestling,[2] when he professes to offer the body of Christ in the Lord’s Supper, pours contempt upon the sacrifice of Christ, offered upon the altar of the cross. He crucifies Christ afresh. He commits the impiety denounced in the sixth chapter of the Epistle to the Hebrews. He not only changes the essentials of the Lord’s Supper, but he does so for the basest end, even that of raking together[3] wealth and filling his coffers, for this is the only use of his tribe of priestling, and his everlasting masses.”

[1]“Dat (Christus) solus virtutem et efficacem Sacramentis, hsec est gratia justificans hominem.” (Acta Col loquii Upsaliensis—ex Baazio.)

[2]“SacrificulusPapisticus.” (Acta Colio quiiUpsaliensis.)

[3]“Corradit opes”, Ivid.)

3 thoughts on “The Mass or the Lord’s Supper?”

  1. Thank you Fuzzy Counsellor. A few fragments missing. Jealousy, the rage of a man. Proverbs 6:34 KJV. The jealous wrath/anger/rage of God. Psalm 79:5, Psalm 78:58 RSV / KJV.


  2. Does everyone know the difference between a metaphor and a simile.
    “Take and eat, this is my body . . . “ Jesus was speaking here metaphorically. Otherwise, He would be advocating canniballism.
    Likewise drinking of the blood shed for sin. That would be promulgating vampirism. Blood of any edible animal is forbidden to be consumed in the bible, for it is the life of the animal. The blood must be poured on the ground dirt. The eating or drinking of blood therefore is a sin, and sin would not be atoned for by such a sin, which I suspect would be a abomination.
    The priest (stolen from Levitical ‘priest’) does drink the altar wine, but the people do not generally due to cost. The crumb flattened and rounded is cheap. But the crumb can be intincted by dipping an edge into the altar wine, the priest helps himself too. This practice is ‘affordably’ cheap.
    The minimised cost to heighten the profits from the collection plates sent around twice in the mass, gets down to a crumb and a drip at most. The nuns make the crumb wafers. Flattening and spreading to make sure there is enough to go round with thrift.
    But first, the bread and wine must be transubstantiated by sorcery, from metaphor into the real flesh and blood of the sinless human Jesus, at the Secret part of the mass. And sorcery is an abomination.
    The fact this real human flesh and blood, stays under the appearance only, of bread and wine, proves it is a fraud. But to the willingly deceived believers, in their mind it is the genuine article. Knowing this, they effectively, cannibalize. Thereby sacrificing their children, from the age of 17, to Molech, in warfare.
    The ritual of the harlotry of the Mass, is enticed, cajoled, urged, encouraged, beseeched, taught and beguiled by Jezebel (the Virgin Mary personified as the Catholic Church Mother), where the practice is likened to fornication for gentiles, and adultery for Israelites. Revelation 2:20.
    This ritual is called, the ‘eating of food offered in sacrifice to idols’.
    The sacrifice is the sacrifice of the Mass.
    The food is the communion – also called the Eucharist.
    The Offertory is a named part of the Mass where food is offered.
    The Communion is a named part of the Mass where the food offered is eaten.
    The Secret is a named part of the Mass.
    The idols are the idolatrous crucifixes high above the forbidden stepped altars, the utmost barest requirements for the Mass, wherever the Mass rite is celebrated.
    Back in the fifties and sixties, the Mass was said in Latin. The Priest offered the recipient the communion host, asking, “Corpus Christi?”
    The recipient held a silver tray, beneath his/her mouth in case the crumb was dropped accidentally. The recipient responded by ‘holding out his/her tongue’ to receive the communion which was placed on the tongue by the priest’s sanitary fingers, which had done so to hundreds of other sickly and healthy tongues. The potential for spread of disease was thereabouts recognised and the practice rectified.
    So the recipient held out his tongue. God sees this as ‘poking out your tongue’ at him giving cheek disrespectfully. You already know that the food has undergone the sorcery of transubstantiation, that the priests/wizards are called Father, making the recipient the son/daughter.
    Here’s the bible angle from Isaiah: –
    ‘But you, draw near hither, sons of the sorceress, offspring of the adulterer and harlot. Of whom are making sport (poking fun at)? Against whom do you open your mouth wide and put out your tongue? Are you not the children of transgression, the offspring of deceit, . . . . ?
    Isaiah 57:3-4. (It mentions the drink offering and cereal offering in verse 6.)
    The Mass ritual of ‘eating food offered in sacrifice to idols’, is also called ‘the secret things of Satan’. Revelation 2:24. Some bibles translate this verse as ‘the deep things of Satan’. And so a part of the Mass is named the Secret. I venture to say it is “Hoc est Corpus Meus”, which the priest pronounces in a whispered voice. This would be the secret words of Transubstantion or sorcery which changes the bread and wine into “This is (now) my body”. This in Latin became the basis for ‘Hocus Pocus’.
    The ‘deep things of Satan’, the Levitical term ‘priest’, the skull cap worn by bishops, cardinals and Pope, and the false claim of being the Apostolic Church, all convince me that this Vatican Church is the real ‘Synagogue of Satan’ pretending to be Jewish, but clearly are not Jews but frauds and impostors to the claim. Revelation 2:2/2:9/3:9. Clearly, the Orthodox Jews only accept the Old Testament, and make no claims at all to being (or accepting) the Apostolic New Testament teachings, and therefore no false claim to being so – they repudiate it in fact.
    Conversely the Catholic Church does make that claim enthusiastically and falsely so. In the Catholic hymn ‘Credo in Unum Deum’, commonly called the ‘I Believe’ and the Apostles’ Creed, are claimed the words, “et unam sanctam Catholicam, et Apostolicam ecclesiam”, which translates as “and one holy, Catholic, and Apostolic church”.
    And it is not surprising that the Orthodox Jews repudiate the New Testament Christianity, because it is drowning in false Vatican Christian idolatry and ritual.
    I saw a picture of a priest in this article holding a large communion host or crumb wafer aloft. The idol crucifix necessary to the Mass ritualistic sacrifice sits high above the stepped and polished marble stone altar – all forbidden to the Levitical priesthood. The eyes of the priest and host is being elevated to the crucifix for some reason.
    Here is what the bible says: –
    ‘Therefore say to them, Thus says the Lord GOD: You eat flesh with the blood, and lift up your eyes to your idols, and shed blood; shall you then possess the land? [As a result] You resort to the sword, you commit abominations and each of you defiles his neighbour’s wife; shall you then possess the land? Say this to them, Thus says the Lord GOD: As I live, surely those in the waste places shall fall by the sword; and him that is in the open field I will give to the beasts to be devoured; and those who are in strongholds or in caves shall die by pestilence. And I will make the land a desolation and a waste; and her proud might shall come to an end; and the mountains of Israel shall be so desolate that none wil pass through. Then they will know that I am the Lord, when I have made the land a desolation and a waste because of all their abominations which they have committed. Ezekiel 33:25-29.

    I noticed on the uplifted communion host pictured in the article was impressed a pressing of a crucifix idol. God calls this idol of a crucifix, and ritual that goes with it two things. He calls it worshipping the way of the heathen, and the crucifix he calls a ‘scarecrow’. That ought to be very educational.
    Here’s what the bible says: –
    Thus says the LORD:
    ”Learn not the way of the heathen,
    nor be dismayed at the signs of the heavens
    because the nations are dismayed at them,
    for the customs of the peoples are false.
    A tree from the forest is cut down,
    and worked with the axe by the hands of a craftsman.
    Men deck it with silver and gold;
    they fasten it with hammer and nails
    so that it cannot move.
    Their idols are like scarecrows in a cucumber field,
    and they cannot speak;
    they have to be carried,
    for they cannot walk.
    Be not afraid of them,
    for they cannot do evil,
    neither is it in them to do good.” Jeremiah 10:2-5 RSV.
    Now google ‘images of scarecrows’ and find out the truth about crucifixes through the eyes of God. Of course crucifixes can be bejewelled and value added by use of precious metals like silver and gold. Notice the wood, hammer and nails as would befit the notion of a scarecrow fastened to it, as though crucified.
    In fact you could sing a hymn to it – ‘The Old Rugged Scarecrow’.

    Further, voodoo is involved. It can stupefy you.
    Here’s what the bible says: –
    Their idols are silver and gold,
    the work of men’s hands.
    They have mouths, but do not speak;
    eyes, but do not see.
    They have ears, but do not hear;
    noses, but do not smell.
    They have hands, but do not feel;
    feet, but do not walk;
    and they do not make a sound in their throat.
    Those who make them are like them;
    so are all who trust in them. Psalm 115:4-8

    And again: –
    The idols of the nations are silver and gold,
    the work of men’s hands.
    They have mouths, but they speak not,
    they have eyes, but they see not,
    they have ears, but they hear not,
    nor is there any breath in their mouths.
    Like them be those who make them! —
    yea, every one who trusts in them! Psalm 135:15-18

    Evidently, what God calls a ‘scarecrow’ can make a ‘strawman’ out of you. Therein lies the voodoo abomination effect of ritual idolatry.
    You might be able to walk and talk and go to school. But when you graduate from the indoctrination centre of the public fool system, you attend, with your PhD, instead of brains you will emerge with jelly – jelly for brains. You can proudly be the strawman you are.
    Jealousy is the rage of a man.
    It is also the wrath of God, whose name is Jealous.
    And it is idolatry that provokes God’s wrath more than anything, a real stench in his nostrils. That His name is Jealous is an addition to the 3rd commandment that absolutely forbids idolatry of images and idols.
    But that exactly is what the Mass is all about – breaking the 3rd commandment – and the consequences that follow.
    Mercifully, God has been slow to anger, not quick tempered.
    But the chastisement will come, and in full measure.

    Liked by 1 person

    1. Wow Peter, this is very comprehensive insight into the subject of the mass. Needless to say I had never made all these connections to the scriptures you cited. But I did see the mass as a return to the system of sacrifice established in the old covenant. Well worth the time to read. Thank you.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.