Contact

Nicklas Arthur
139 E TULARE AVE
TULARE  CA  93274

Please use the support button in the left column.

LEAVE TEXT MESSAGE IN COMMENTS BELOW & please subscribe by using the link in the upper left column on home page or click on the pop-up follow button lower right.

e-mail: me(at)nicklasarthur.info

133 thoughts on “Contact”

  1. Dear Mr. Arthur,

    I’ve been enjoying The Last Prophecy. I’m a little confused concerning the Two Witnesses. If I understand the author’s exposition, the witnesses were to testify 1260 days, they were to be silenced, they were to be resurrected. This was fulfilled at the Reformation’s beginning when Luther undertook the work, three and a half years after Rome had silenced all opposition. Is this correct? If so, that would put the beginning of the 1260 days well before 606 A.D. would it not? Your assistance in understanding this would be appreciated. -Jeff Rojan

    Like

    1. The symbolic resurrection of the witnesses “after they have finished their testimony” would not be fixed at the end of the 1260 days, but before their ascendancy to the political heaven in the reformation continued line of witnesses, as their enemies watched from the earthly capital of Christendom, Rome – the type of Jerusalem, the Capital of the National Jewish church symbol.

      Like

  2. You mentioned in video Historicism Explained Pt. 01, Defense of Reformed Eschatology. Using Historicism to show one day is one year. You can also use scriptures in Genesis 29:25-30. In this scripture shows how a week is seven years. So by simple math you can also show 1 day is one year.

    Liked by 1 person

  3. Hi. Doing research on the Jewish Calendar year and thoughts about a Millennial Week with a Millennial Sabbath at the end. Liked a lot of what you have to say. Thanks for the thoughts. In the end though as I pursue God, a deeper relationship with Him, and to shine like a star in a wicked and depraved generation I find that few people believe in the spiritual maturity that I believe God reveals in the Bible. That connection with Him would be a primary way to be protected from being deceived or giving into pressure in the last days. I believe that God shows us in the Bible that we can gauge how well we are abiding in Jesus by observing our performance. The worse our performance (obedience) is flawed the more that we should troubleshoot where our connection has weakened. I am concerned that I meet a growing number of people who admit that their performance is pretty flawed and yet they feel no need to do anything different to strengthen their connection to Jesus. They just keep going with very minor growth rather than real transformation. So, bringing it down to me. God has brought me far but when I check myself based upon Phil 2 and the book of James there is still a lot of transformation that needs to happen. When I read the end of John 17 I long to find a community like Jesus prays for us to be. My question for you is; how far has God brought you and do you have any practical advice for believers who are considered mature by their communities and yet see so much more in Scripture but don’t know the next step to get there faster?

    Like

    1. To try to answer what it is you are asking, Read the word and allow the Holy Spirit to work repentance to obedience. If we love God we will desire to obey Him despite our Adamic nature. peace and blessing

      Like

  4. Hi Niklas,

    What is your take on the scripture in Matthew that says “call no one on earth your father…”

    I have been reading some articles where the viewpoint is that this is largely taken out of context as there are other scriptures saying we should “give honor where honor is due.” Also there are places where the apostles (again, a title) referee to leaders as father and others as brethren and sisters, etc.

    So in the light of us being Protestant and for the most part, only Catholics and some other Catholic emulating “Christian” denominations having this tradition, how should we refer to these men? I don’t want to be one to dishonor someone of a title they have earned, but I struggle with this verse. Also is the verse that says “not to even greet one who comes with another doctrine.” Given that we know the anti-Christ is from Rome and those who follow time as with him, should we just refer to them as ‘sir’ or ‘Mr.’ if we need to address them somehow in passing?

    Appreciate your ministry and for your response.

    Like

      1. Isn’t the passage in Matthew instructing people to not assume religious titles to themselves and Lord it over others, and to be on guard against anyone doing this? The context of the passage surely seems so.
        And this would include not only the religious titles of “father” but also “rabbi” and, by obvious implication, “pastor.”
        When Tom Friess refers to “pastors” as “priesters,” I assume this is his line of thinking.
        Thus, while there is a calling or position of “pastor/teacher,” a person who desires to be called “Pastor So-and-so” is doing the same thing that a priest is doing when he expects to be called “father.”
        This interpretation, by the way, is the only rational way of answering Romanists who question why Protestants think it’s okay to call their biological dad “father,” but not a priest.

        Like

        1. If I meet one functioning as a pastor I call them “brother” in addition to their first name. Others call them Pastor. I would not take a title to myself thought others have addressed me by functions which I do on occasion take on. God judges the thoughts and intents of the heart, I think each one of us needs to apply the words of Jesus individually and not worry so much about others.

          It is odd and note worthy that the RCC applies the name Father to all of their priests, though none of them are actually Fathers nor do they qualify for leadership in the church not having ever ruled their own house or had a wife. I think the RCC is directly implied here, also we need to look at the term as used in Judaea/Rome at the time Jesus gave the instruction for more insight.

          Like

  5. Allow me to respond to “Alabama may stop issuing state marriage business licenses”. That would be a very wise decision!
    First, there are no state marriage laws in the United States or U.S. Territory’s today. Why? because the Jewish and Catholic Supremes voided all state marriage laws. True, States still issue state marriages licenses, but they do so on their own accord; unlawfully so believing they are still sovereign (not bondwomen with privileges). Today, if their family court system has authority “post” supreme court vision licensed state marriages the matter will have to be tested in courts of law.
    Scenario: Let’s say a man or wife desires to dissolve their marriage, if one objects can family court legally dissolve the marriage. This question should have already produced lawsuits where the one individual claims a damage. If that happens they would win. Why? Show me the family court’s authority (jurisdiction) in their State Constitution? OK then, what jurisdiction does one file such a complaint? The County, the State Supreme Court, or Federal Court?
    This issue could very well lead to huge out of court settlements. There are no legal jurisdictions in the United States that can dissolve marriages today; only the man and wife have the (scriptural) lawful authority to do that. Marriages today might be considered common law, but if fact they are patriarchal by way (maintained by our families) tradition, the marriage ceremony is in effect scripturally founded.
    The bride and groom are married before the state document is signed by the officiant (state agent) and submitted to the county. Couples in America had two separate and distinct marriages, one with Almighty God, before His throne (if under God’s law); the other was to the State, before the law of man. They were playing the harlot, just like states church do today. Cesar’s preachers used the teach legal marriage was everything righteous and holy. Today, not so many.
    The Supremes did, having earned reprobates minds, they had no other choice. They left God’s marriages intact because they had no authority to nullify, and they dissolved all legal state business marriages between one man and one women. How? by nullifying State Constitution marriage laws altogether. Today those couples are no longer married to the State (in a state marriage business). They are no longer one-flesh with unbelievers, or sodomites, before the law of man. And … on top of that blessing, they received their children back!
    The state or “condition” of Alabama appears to be quite astute, not only concerning God’s marriage principles but of legal reality and its consequences, including potential financial impact in continuing to issue state marriages licenses. Ask yourself this question. You have heard of State children. Do State’s have children today? I say no, State’s no longer have children. If true then what about mandatory attendance in State public schools? …………..!
    See, few saw God’s hand at work here; most American’s have been taught that Almighty God (the Father, the Son, and Holy Spirit) does not intervene in the affairs of man, so they don’t expect such work. For those that know differently it was a sight to behold, a true blessing and gift, of restoration and preservation. Why He intervened is not a secret, it’s just not acknowledge (or taught) by society or in our State churches. Why? By agreement its unlawful for incorporated churches to teach truth, they must teach public policy instead!

    Fire is coming … Thank you for all your hard work.
    Lonnie L. – Aman (believe, repent)

    Liked by 1 person

  6. Hi Nicklas, listening to your Daniel study trying to understand the 70 weeks and 2300 days prophecies Daniel 8 & 9. In Daniel 9:26 the people of the prince that is to come are the Romans who destroy the sanctuary and the city Jerusalem in 70AD correct? So then is the prince that is to come refereeing to the Antichrist? Also in Daniels vision of Daniel 8 is it the Antichrist that is the fierce and mighty King that comes to power when the transgressors are come to the full. or the emperor of Rome in 70 AD or both.

    Like

    1. Hi Timlov,

      My take on that would be no, Titus the prince who came and destroyed Jerusalem was not the anti-Christ. The anti-Christ is the Papacy which rose from the grave of the Roman power he represented (the people).

      There are two powers (or horns) to concern ourselves with. One is the enemy without, and one is the enemy within. 2 horns of the same devil (if you will).

      The one you inquire about in chapter 8 is not the Papal power described in chapter 7. Greece had divided into 4 separate kingdoms represented by 4 horns.

      – The Seleucid Kingdom was annexed by Rome in 63BC
      – The Macedonian Kingdom (Cassander’s) became a province of Rome in 149BC
      – The Kingdom of Pergamon (Lyssimachus’) was bequeathed to Rome in 133BC.
      – The Kingdom of Egypt (Ptolemy’s) became a Roman province in 30BC upon the death of Cleopatra

      Although history records that Rome replaced Greece, the Islamic Caliphate (much later) grew out of one of those 4 horns in the latter part of their kingdom. (Long after and not part of the sequence in Daniel 2,7.).

      Antiochus Epiphanes can be seen as the type and initial fulfillment but the secondary fulfillment is the career of the Mohammedan power. This is also seen in Revelation. Here are some references.

      +++++++++

      The Saracenic invasion and the Turkish overthrow are indeed predicted in Revelation, for the fifth and sixth, trumpets are universally recognized as prefiguring the sore “woes” which were inflicted on the apostate Christian Church of the East by these desolating powers.

      But the Mohammedan conquests are there viewed in connexion with the Christian Churches of the East, and not in connexion with Syria and the Jews. Yet they stand in a most important relation to Israel also, and in this connexion, they are presented in [Daniel 8].

      It is as the desolater of Jerusalem, and the ruler of Judæa for twelve centuries, that this Moslem power principally affects Israel; it occupies the Holy Land and treads down Jerusalem, and has done so ever since AD. 637, when the Caliph Omar first brought the country under subjection to Mohammedan despotism. (Henry Grattan Guinness D. D. – Light for the Last Days)

      +++++++++

      This short description below explains why and how Daniel chapter 7 and 8 are dealing with two separate entities and timelines. The link at the bottom is good for a detailed study.

      +++++++++

      Daniel 2:4 to the end of Daniel 7 was written in a Gentile language, Chaldean (or Aramaic), while Daniel 8 to the end of the books resumes the use of Hebrew.

      As Guinness pointed out in Light for the Last Days, chapter 12, this is because the subject of the visions in chapters 2 to 7 pertains to the “times of the Gentiles”, the duration of the trampling of Jerusalem by Gentile powers, but the main characters during this time are
      Gentile, not Jewish.

      The empires are Babylon, Medo-Persia, Greek and Rome; the principal antagonist is “the little horn” of chapter 7, which wages its war against, not the Jewish nation, but the Gospel professing Christian, and Protestant churches.

      The little horn is the dynasty of the Roman Catholic Popes, first at the head of a so-called “Christian” Empire, then finally confined to the little nation-state, the Vatican. Aramaic is the language of these visions.

      Then, with the switch to Hebrew, Daniel sees the same period of time not focused on the Christian Church and its strife, but on the Jewish nation.

      Here, though the time period, “2300 days” (verse 14), spans the entire time of the four Greek successor kingdoms, all the way to after the fall of the Byzantine Empire, and is marked by milestones of history relating to those Gentile nations, the main interest of this prophecy is none other than the city of Jerusalem.

      During most of this period, Jerusalem was suffering its “desolations” during the long scattering of the Jews around the nations of the Earth following the events of 70AD. The perspective, though focused
      on the city and not its scattered population, is Jewish, not Gentile. So the language of this prophecy and the ones to follow is Hebrew.

      http://historicism.com/Haynes/Daniel8Exposition.pdf

      Like

        1. Hi Nicklas, I don’t know how to get hold of you, I know your are a busy man doing the Lord errands, but I need to speak to you I had been working on a project for the Spanish speaking people but need lots of information and advise, I want to help my people. Less than a year ago I give up mormonism and after praying to the Lord and lots of study, the Lord Jesus christ fund me and rescue my soul from this world of confusion and deception, after going thru different flavors of poison, I had tasted the truth that the Lord guide me al through your message and other finding historicism the Lords truth way of prophetic interpretation. Now I’m here ready to work for Him, if in any way I can help I’ll be very happy to do it. out of busy schedule give me few minutes need to publish a book and start a program so people can hear this message, and duplicate it, please I need your help, and the Lord Jesus christ bless you for all your hard work, thank you

          Attn. hector my number is
          (801)739-2842

          Like

        2. Hector, I do appreciate your zeal and desire to serve God. My advice would be to start by starting writing your own blog. You can start one free at wordpress.com – try publishing the first chapter of your book there. I will be you first subscriber. I would be glad to help in any way I can. please e-mail me accordingly – me@nicklasarthur.info – so I can carefully consider any request.
          peace, Nicklas

          Like

    1. Now as then the Jews are stuck on all of their extra-biblical rules and regulations.

      Making the word of God of none effect through your tradition, which ye have delivered: and many such like things do ye. (Mar 7:13)
      Thus have ye made the commandment of God of none effect by your tradition. (Mat 15:6)

      Like

  7. Hello Nicklas! Am loving your teachings and wondering how to give to you online. I do not see any links on how to help support your ministry! I know you’re off the grid and not sure if you can take a check, so will probably just send cash to the address above. Also, am feeling lead to share all of my grain that I’ve been storing but not sure how I would get it to you. I have over a dozen 5 gallon buckets full of mostly wheat and some rye and barley. Is that something you can use for growing crops your animals? Or just grinding into flour? Let us know I will be praying about that 🙂 Yah bless and am praying for you and thank you for all you do! Nottypines (will start tuning in live again. Was unable to listen in when you went to evenings)

    Liked by 1 person

    1. Hi Carrie, thanks for the note, I’m so glad that you are being edified and blessed, sending cash to the above address will be fine or checks for FirstAmendmentRadio here: http://wwfar.com/ChipIN.pdf.

      I buy multiple 50 lb sacks of seed grain to plant 6 acres for my critters every year (yields about 120 bales). I actually had buckets of grain once but finally planted them too, the seeds still worked after so many years – the Fathers Tech is awesome!.

      The live evenings were more difficult for me too, glad to be back to the live Wed. morning – look forward to seeing you there.
      peace and blessing
      N

      Like

  8. The wheat and the tares grow together until the end! Cinderella is not in plane view for all to behold! The early reformers came out of the woman that rides the beast. The woman is a mother, her daughter’s protested against her at first. Did I answer your question?

    Like

  9. Hello Nicklas: I’m interested in Christ’s prophocy concerning certain worldy conditions that trigger His return, it appears the type of wickedness and evil He discribed concerning the world has come to fruision: meeting the requirements His second comming. No one seems to be discusing the scope of the matter, yet, the scripture is plain; heaven and earth – melt with ferbunt heat, etc. We live in a world that has become Sodam… And its destruction appears to be nearing. When the rainbow promise turns to fire. Has all other preceeding prophecies been fulfilled or not? Is fire comming soon?

    Like

  10. Four questions to see if we are on the same page. (I have had Elliot’s four volumes for years. I also have a PHD in biblical research, my thesis was on the antediluvian period, 5175 to 3519 BC. My chronology is correct and harmonizes Egypt’s and Persian chronologies. I have Israel’s correct old calendar as well that can be transposed on any calendar today). Four questions:
    #1) What day of the 6 day creation sequence was Adam formed and made a living soul?
    #2) Where does the old Testament end and the New Testament begin in the context of the Bible?
    #3) What must I do to be saved?
    #4) Has the battle of Armageddon already happened?

    Like

    1. Hi Nickolas; I has promise to send you the oil of Oreganol p73 1-847-473-4700. North America Herb and Spice co. I could talk for hours how this produce had help people. But the proof is in the taste. That said, I would like to ask you about attending churches that preach the gospel and believe all other faiths are false yet still hold to the dispensation futurism is The Lord calling us out of these churches? I ‘m having no fellowship with christains who I believe they are like I was in deception yet loves the Lord and it breaks my heart not to be with them. What do you say? Thanks for your impute.

      Like

  11. Hi, I saw your name in Doug E. Cox “creation concept”… can you help me about his background? Is he a mormon? Is he a born again christian? thanks

    Like

  12. Hello Nicklas,

    I was trying to understand how the year 6000 (and I fully accept that it is the “beginning” of the 7th Millennium) is the time of the Millennial reign of Christ. God’s laws have always followed the work for six days (which means one is still actually working for the entire 6th day, then rest/Sabbath on the Seventh Day (the actual “Sabbath” rest period).

    What (finally) helped me to understand your reasoning for ‘What Year is It? was the simple Table below, which may also help others to understand that the Millennium reign of Christ MUST be approximately around the year 2055, if we are indeed in or near the year 5945-5950.

    For example, see below:

    (God worked for 6 days, then rested on the Seventh/Sabbath).

    If we hold true to God’s immutable laws, then the following chart is true also.

    (Earth’s) Work Day 1 = Year 0000 to 1000
    (Earth’s) Work Day 2 = Year 1001 to 2000
    (Earth’s) Work Day 3 = Year 2001 to 3000
    (Earth’s) Work Day 4 = Year 3001 to 4000
    (Earth’s) Work Day 5 = Year 4001 to 5000
    (Earth’s) Work Day 6 = Year 5001 to 6000

    (If we are now somewhere in the years 5945-50, the time is indeed near…)

    THE SABBATH MILLENNIUM: 6001 to 7000

    (When the Earth shall have it’s Sabbath rest whether “we” want it to or not. I imagine that all “commerce” must stop at this time whether “we” want it to or not)

    God Bless
    Claude
    South Australia

    Like

    1. Thank you for this, however this comment would have been much better placed on the What Year IS IT page where those readers could benefit from it.

      Like

  13. I have a question about 2 Thes 2:4 where Paul talks about the future anti-christ setting himself up in the temple of God as though he was God. Questoin: Where is this temple? Is it spiritual or physical? If it’s physical which Strongs suggests, then wouldn’t that support the view that the prince in Daniels 70th week is the anti-christ? I’m almost on board with you in terms of the logic of 70 weeks being fulfilled without a gap, it’s just that there are other verses in the Bible that talk about a great tribulation and the man of sin setting himself up in the Temple at the mid point in the 7 years. I’ll continue to search the scriptures to support my view, which has gone more neutral, but I need to make sense of other scripture that goes against the 70th week being fulfilled. Revelation talks about the 7 year tribulation, which goes with Matthew 24, etc… Just started reading your book “The Rapture Has been Canceled.” (which, by the way, is a bit misleading. the “catching up/gathering together’ of the saints hasn’t been canceled…) Thanks.

    Like

    1. Got it. Thanks. Makes good sense now. I have come a long way from pre tribber, to pre-wrath tribber, to post trib with a futuristic interpretation of Daniel to an understanding that everything in the 70 weeks is fulfilled and there will no longer need to be a temple for the man of sin to proclaim him self G-d. Now I need to gain understanding on what has to happen before our Lord Jesus Christ returns. I know you mentioned 30 some odd years before you think He returns. Where does that idea come from? Thanks!

      Like

  14. Daniel’s Seventy Weeks Challenge: Do you have the dates and why they are important to the prophecy.

    Like

  15. NIcklas, regarding the mark of the beast monetary system….how does one (such as myself) cancel the SSN system i need help in this area. please email me back at jessevassil at yahoo dot com. Or reply here, which ever is easier for you thank you for all you do and the Lord bless you

    Like

    1. JJ, It is not your account or number. YOU cannot cancel their number or their account. They refuse to cancel accounts. But you do have the right to repent and then as required by true repentance, cease and desist all use and activity associated with this evil system.
      If one is still involved in idolatry, covetousness, fornication etc. All of these must be forsaken in true repentance. His Holy Spirit will lead you if you are willing.
      this may help: http://wwfar.com/mp3s/CrossTheBorder/SS-TravelDoc.pdf
      peace

      Liked by 2 people

  16. I enjoy your blogs and have told several of my friends. I was curious how I could get some of your information to a friend of mine who is working on getting out of the beast system but does not have internet services. She would like to know more about becoming sovereign or how to become self reliant and not dependent on the government (corporation) because she wants completely out of it. She does not know how to make a living, get food, etc. She does not know any other way than that of the worldly system and she is wanting to make the changes. She cannot call out but can accept phone calls. Can you let me know if you would like her number to help her understand or is there a program that I can download for her to watch? She has to watch it on the computer at the public library which only allots her a half hour of time. She said I can give you her phone number. Please let me know what or if you can help her. Thanks. I am also learning about this yet and not as far along as she is. any help will be wonderful and very much appreciated. Thank you

    Like

    1. I dont know anything about “becoming sovereign” but I do know about accepting Jesus as my Sovereign King. Jesus said “repent for the Kingdom is at hand” So repent, enter His kingdom and do your best to become obedient to His Kingdom Laws with the help of His Holy Spirit and share the gospel of the Kingdom with others. Read the gospels so you understand what His kingdom is and share that with family, friends and strangers.

      In separating from the world it may be good to carry a travel document like this, but it must be a true witness of your life. http://wwfar.com/mp3s/CrossTheBorder/travel/

      Like

      1. concerning “Becoming Sovereign” I think it has to do with gaining a private Citizens status once again. Maybe in that way you can get rid of your Social Security Number

        Like

  17. Hey Nicklas. very interested in reading your book, but I ordered it 2 times on PDF through paypal and never received anything. The first time I thought I had made a mistake so I ordered it again.

    Like

    1. sent link to your email on the 20th, resent just now, check your spam box, let me know you got it, also paypal should’ve forwarded you to download folder when complete.
      thanks

      Like

  18. Praise the Lord brother!

    Came to know about you and your ministry after you posted on my blog ‘Aadhaar card a prelude to 666’

    Will surely study your blog deeply.

    K Stephen Daniel, Bangalore, India

    Like

  19. I am also of the historicist school and would like to rebroadcast one of your sermons (perhaps more) on my radio station. Please contact me to grant permission.

    Like

  20. I am a listener to your programs and I really enjoy your truth telling no nonsense commentary to today’s life. Since last night I have been try to get onto you website and I cannot connect to firstamendmentradio.net. Are you updating the website? God bless and protect you in everything that you do.

    Like

  21. I like your book that you have been reading called final apocalypse. Only problem is that you find that it is a very deep book taking a lot thought.

    Like

  22. Hi Nicholas:
    Would you be interested to know about Gods money?
    Or, be willing to share what you think about it…

    Lonnie

    Like

  23. Nicklas, I have come to understand lately that following the “christian churches” and government of Canada (i live in Canada) is going against the will of Yahweh. I’m currently studying the bible and other resources that follow the same path as you. I do have all the marks (cards, driver’s license, loans…) and they are a sign, a proof what I have done . Have you legally left the system? If so, how do you remove yourself from the system?

    Thanks and blessings. – Philippe

    Like

  24. eyeHello Nicklas,
    The website you gave for paypal doesn’t connect. I still think you should have a Paypal open donate button on your specific site for flexibility. I think you are losing out by not having this. Anyway, i bought your book today at Lulu. Waiting for it to come to compare what i had learnt.
    About five years ago, the Holy Spirit set me a task to get a magnifier, a Strong’s concordance, to comb through Genesis. This was tedious. I had no computer and i still don’t have one. I listen to you on my smart phone. Anyway, when i came upon the word LORD, i was shocked to find that the name of God was YAHOWAH. I know we have one letter different: where i have an “O”, you have a “U” (and i am going to review again, for my tools were primitive), but i am glad to see someone come up with a similar conclusion of the Name. I wondered why it was not translated as is and found out that the Jews thought it too holy to pronounce, and so they replaced i it with Lord.
    Thanks for your eye opening lectures.
    Marsha Gordon.

    Like

    1. Sister Marsha, thank you, I will look into the paypal smart phone problem. The name pronunciation “Jehovah” was probably more correct in the 17th century when you consider the Jeh sounded as it does in Hallelujah, and the letters u, v, and w (double v) have actually changed in pronunciation since then. Be sure to come back to my get-the-book page and write a review.

      Like

  25. Hello Nicholas I must say I am kinda relatively new to the historicist thought but once I decided to look at this angle a few years back its like a floodgate was opened up Praise God. I do have a question though. I am having a decent conversation with a preterist on my youtube channel and its going very well I want to share what he wrote and my first response and his latest response.

    Im kinda stuck on how to answer his second question as if he seemed to ignore all the other points i made in my original response here it is.

    Robby Young4 days ago (edited)

    Jesse, Thanks for your time and serious consideration to stand firm on an issue. However, the historicists view clearly contradicts every time statement and audience relevance passage in the bible. I’m a full preterist, so how do you, as a historicists, answer the time statements and audience relevance question?

    For example, YAHWEH gave us book ends so that there is no mistaking the timing – Rev. 1:1 and 22:12 & 20 says this ONE revelation, in it’s entirety, will happen very soon! That’s the entire book written in the 1st Century before 70 A.D.

    It’s been 2000 years and that makes God out to be a liar! So, let’s start there.

    God Bless!

    MY RESPONSE

    jessevassil4 days ago (edited)

    Thats a good question and This is how I feel on the whole time issue.
    The phrases I come quickly and I am coming soon as you have stated I personally believe as that we should look at how God views time for he is long suffering is he not?

    So my answer to that question is that we should look at those two phrases coming quickly and coming soon as not thinking as man thinks but as God thinks for His aspect of time is not our aspect of time so we need to always be willing and ready for when that day or a specific event does come? So no Its not really making God out to be a liar but in reality making God smaller by stating just because revelation was written prior to 70ad all those things therein our all fulfilled when that totally contradicts revelation 1:19

    Rev 1:19 Write the things which thou hast seen(Past), and the things which are (present time in writing of this book), and the things which shall be hereafter; (future events )

    Regarding the “….. things which shall be hereafter” are we to assume that the hereafter concludes at 70ad?

    that would clearly be putting Jesus Christ (God) in a box especially when he states I am the beginning and ending, alpha and omega etc. wouldnt it?

    I also wanted to make clear and I apologize if I didnt.that just based on the context of the videos I produce here that although I stand in a historicist mindset doesnt mean that I totally agree with every ounce of doctrine that comes from other historicists for example SDA could be considered historicist and I agree with some of there interpretations or doctrines but there are some that I totally shun like the 2300 days and the little horn of daniel 8 being the same as the little horn of daniel 7 and the 2300 days being fulfilled in 1844.

    Now you as a preterist probably have a somewhat similar belief as I do in matthiew 24, mark 13 and luke 21 but probably where we would differentiate is I believe that certain passages I believe must be taken as duel types of fulfillment in context with typology where you and correct me if I am wrong would take those passages to mean that they all had a literal one time fulfillment in 70ad?

    one thing I know we both agree on just from your statement is the aspect of dispensational theology.

    HIS RESPONSE

    +jessevassil Hi Jesse, thanks for the response. The whole question on how God views time to nullify time statements HE GIVES is absolutely unbiblical. I say this kindly and with serious hermeneutical proof. For example, show me anywhere in scripture where near means distance future and distance future means near??? I’m telling you it doesn’t exist!

    Here’s another one, every single 1st Century believer were given a soon expectation of the end. Yeshua and The Apostles were crystal clear Their Generation would witness the end of the age. Did you know YAHWEH warned The Jews concerning misrepresenting HIS time statements when judgement is eminent? Read Ezekiel 11:2-3 and 12:22-28.

    This is what Peter was reminding The Jews of his day concerning their scoffing and ridicule concerning the end of the age. YAHWEH is long-suffering but the time had arrived, so near means NEAR! It’s been over 1000 years since Ezekiel’s days when Peter proclaims, (1 Peter 4:7) but the end of all things is at hand…

    So is YAHWEH playing games? No, the context is crystal clear and the time statements stand firm.

    I’m not ignoring the rest of your response, but this point of the discussion is the only relevant ground to find truth at this time. What is your response?

    God Bless and remember, I love you Bro!

    Please feel free to address this in a future radio program if you must Thank you and God bless you

    Like

  26. Nicklas, a friend gave me a link to your website and I’m so very happy to have access to your studies. I love that you address the 70th week of Daniel in a clear, logical way. That is such a key prophecy that has been used by the enemy to deceive people. I’ve posted several studies on it proving that the covenant is Jesus New Covenant, and that the Prince is Jesus sending the Roman army to desolate the unbelieving Jews. I just purchased the PDF of your book and look forward to reading it. Thank you for all of the labor that you have put into these studies, to help people see the truth. Grace and peace and love to you in Christ’s name, David

    Liked by 1 person

  27. Hi Nicklas. I really enjoy your presentations and I agree that the 70 weeks of Daniel has been fulfilled just as you explained. Just goes to show you how enormous the deception really is as so many Christians are going to be looking for the false prophecies they’re been taught to come true instead, like rapture and the signing of the peace treaty by the antichrist to signify that Tribulation has started, and so on. When they’re not “taken away” as believed, many will lose faith and become lost. And for this, I pray. Anyway, I wanted to let you know, if you haven’t found a publisher for your book yet, I can suggest one for you. They’re called “Booklocker.” You can go to http://publishing.booklocker.com to read all the information there about them. I am an author who has published a book with them (they’re online publishers, publishing Books on Demand in hard or soft cover copies, plus Ebooks like kindle and more) and I think they’re service is great. Anyway, take care and I will keep viewing!

    Like

  28. Hey i came across your video: America Beast 2 and was wondering if i could share it on youtube and show others, thanks.

    Like

  29. Your main argument is that Jesus could not have “confirmed the covenant…for one week” because his ministry was “cut off” in the middle of the week and that’s only 3 1/2 years. Let me ask you : Does Jesus minister today? Did Jesus rise from the dead? Was He alive for the following 3 1/2 years? The scripture supports… He confirmed the covenant by rising from the dead, remember the Pharisees believed in the resurrection as part of the covenant as opposed to the Sadducees who did not. Jesus did confirm the covenant for the entire 70th week, first by His works and words, signs and wonders; then by His resurrection and unless you deny “that wherever two or more are gathered in my name” He was there ministering the Gospel to Israel in and through His disciples for the remaining 3 and 1/2 years “determined for Israel.” For the first 3 1/2 years he would say “I have not come but to the lost sheep of the house of Israel” and it wasn’t until 3 1/2 years after His sacrifice that the Gospel went to the Gentiles, concluding the exclusive position determined for Israel by the 70 weeks-490 years.
    please post your reply on the appropriate page here: https://nicklasarthur.wordpress.com/2013/09/03/daniels-70-weeks-challenge/

    Like

    1. The abomination of desolation has not been set up, the consummation has not come (consummation is the end of the age), and your math is incorrect. 458 + 30 = 488, not 483. You mischaracterized what I said in your comment above. You need to understand the 70th week of Dan.9:27 in the light of Mat.24:1-35, and the two 31/2 yr. time periods given in Rev. 11:2-3,Rev. 12:6,14, and Rev.13:5. See Dan. 7:25 also. The gospel didn’t go to the uncircumcision until about 7 yrs. after it went to the circumcision. If you listen to the July 14, 2013 recording you will learn that the Gentiles are the previously scattered (and divorced) ten tribed northern kingdom. Rom. 9:24-26 takes us to Hos.1:4-10, and Hos. 2:23. Then you will have a Biblical identification of the Gentiles instead of a Catholic and Protestant misidentification

      Like

  30. Nicklas,
    I asked who the “Restrainer” was in 2 Thessalonians 2:6-7
    You thought it was the Romans if I recall.

    This is a challenging scripture IMO and pre-Tribbers say the Restrainer is the Holy Spirit or the Church in order to support their position. Would love to see an hour devoted to this one. Thanks
    Also…can I donate via Paypal?
    KB

    Like

    1. I thought the restrainner was lawlessness itself. From the midst of lawlessness the lawless one is birthed. Just like the body prevents birth until its proper time. From altering human DNA to unjust scales, undeclared wars, and who knows what else they ar brewing that is contrary to God’s natural law. Birthing pains of Mathew 24.

      Like

  31. Nicklas, Listening to one of your broadcasts the other day you said how much you like coffee. I hope the coffee you drink is organic because regular coffee is one of the most toxic foods we can eat. It is heavily sprayed with pesticides and chemicals. Thought I would share that with you.Shalom!

    Like

  32. Hi Nicklas,
    I’m always interested in your opinion and listen very intently as often as possible. I was wondering if you’ve ever heard of Steve Quayle? I listen to him from time to time as he speaks very profoundly on end times, biblical issues, survival and the like. I don’t particularly trust the shows he is invited to speak on but he alone could be one of those “voices in the wilderness” however I just don’t know what I think yet. Was just wondering if you’ve come across his material in your researching. Thanks. Love your shows by the way. Peace.

    Like

    1. yes I have known about Steve since the turn of the century. He is very popular and a good business man. I think that simply because of my view on Nephilim he would have nothing to do with me, that would not be good for business.

      Like

  33. Hello Brother Nicklas, I have been listening to your study in Corinthians on CD. I have enjoyed listening to them and they have been very helpful. It was also good to see you on PRTV. I listen to them mostly on the Cd’s that you send since I have limited internet access but it was good to put a face to whom I have been listening to for about two years now I guess. THANKS! and SHALOM

    Like

  34. Great Bible study today (Apr.09, 2013) in Matthew 27, Nicklas.

    The “abomination of desolation” I believe is identified in the following verses:

    Mat 24:15 KJV – When ye therefore shall see the abomination of desolation, spoken of by Daniel the prophet, stand in the holy place, (whoso readeth, let him understand:)

    2Th 2:3 KJV – Let no man deceive you by any means: for [that day shall not come], except there come a falling away first, and that man of sin be revealed, the son of perdition;
    2Th 2:4 KJV – Who opposeth and exalteth himself above all that is called God, or that is worshipped; so that he as God sitteth in the temple of God, shewing himself that he is God.

    Like

  35. Hi Nicklas, Listening to your Prophesy Reality show on CD from a couple of weeks ago I believe you missed the mark when you said Yahushua broke the letter of the law by healing on the Sabbath and picking grain in the fields and so on. I don’t believe He ever broke the letter or the spirit of the law otherwise he would not have been our PERFECT sacrifice. I believe the Scriptures show us that the scribes and pharisees had made there own rules for Sabbath keeping that were not biblical and Yahushua was showing us the truth about Sabbath Keeping There are examples in the Scriptures of what to do and not to do on the Sabbath and I have not found anywhere what Yahushua did was against Elohim’s Law.

    Like

    1. I guess the point, or question is whether it was necessary for Jesus to keep the Letter of the Law in order to qualify for the necessary perfection that was required… Or is the Spirit of the Law preeminent?

      Like

  36. Nicklas, on your show you ask for folks to drop you a message and let you know we’re listening. Todays show was timely for me as Ive been troubled on a particular matter and your words helped me see that Ive actually been struggling with faith, so a hearty thanks out to you , and I’m listening.

    Like

  37. Thank you, My heart tells me that a love doesn’t condemn. I truly want to believe that it doesn’t matter, yet I sincerely desire to please Christ. Maybe, in the end, using this title is the sure bet. I appreciated your viewpoint. I trust you are a rational man. Blessings,

    Like

  38. Hello Nicklas,
    I am really struggling to grasp the true “name” of GOD. Ehyeh? YHWH? Ya? YahooSHUa? Yeshua? Jesus? Does anyone have the answer, or has the truth been buried by countless scribes and lost to us over time? I read your article on God’s true name & thought it was insightful until I read ya-god-origin.html
    God help us, if we teach others a falsehood when it comes to the true name of the one TRUE GOD. I’m trembling right now just thinking of the implications. I respect your insight & I am hoping you will comment further on this piece. Respectfully,

    Like

    1. I know that the God that I worship in spirit and truth is not so petty that He would condemn those who do not correctly pronounce His Name. It is a different God that would lead others to condemn you thereby – who is the Accuser of the Brethren? Walk in the liberty wherewith Christ has made you free – we will all be corrected without condemnation when He returns. PEACE and Halleluyah \o/

      Like

  39. Hi Nicklas,
    Thank you for your program. I enjoy it and learn from it. I would like to start a non-for-profit and would like tax-exempt status, but have not formed the 501c3 …
    Mary

    Like

  40. Hello Nicklas, I just recently found your site. I am curious about the various versions of the Holy Bible, having been translated so many times, versions, or the centuries. I recently aquired a copy of the Holy Bile in Modern English, by Ferrar Fenton. What do you think of this particular translation? I’ve read his works were translated directly from the original Hebrew, Chaldee, and Greek manuscripts and are very different than the King James rendition. Will you send your reply directly to my email address? Thank you so much. God Bless.

    Like

    1. Fenton’s misguided translation was written specifically to modernize the bible to parallel the “evidence” of Evolution. To better understand how the original languages were translated in the KJV use the E-sword.net bible as it comes with the KJV and the Strongs Greek and Hebrew tools automatically. Just because Fenton claims to have translated directly from the original texts does not mean that he did not have a specific agenda which becomes crystal clear upon reading the first chapter of his Genesis version. see: http://crosstheborder.org/daniel-927-new-english-versions-confusion/

      Like

  41. Hello Nicklas,
    I find your views and explanations very interesting and would like to get more information, as well as, perhaps to donate to help support your work. However, as I am in Australia, to send a check, a significant fee shall be charged by the bank for the exchange (over here, I would be charged a $15 dollar fee to deposit even a $10 USD check).
    My question therefore is, do you have a Paypal account through which I could transfer the funds?
    Many thanks
    Chris

    Like

  42. I’ve been researching the ‘moonth’ and ‘what year since creation is it’ and came across this site which I thought you may be interested in researching for yourself. It talks about a 360 day calendar common to many nations prior to some catastrophe. And that since that time the solar calendar year of 365.25 days has happened. Anyway, here it is: http://www.creationism.org/patten/PattenMarsEarthWars/PattenMEW11.htm
    be at peace & be blessed, Thomas

    Like

    1. Yes I understand that there most likely was a change with the flood catastrophe. However the calendar given to the Hebrews was post flood and a year is a year whether pre or post flood, one does not change the count of the other. I wish this comment had been made on the moonth page

      Like

  43. hi am kamor frm sudan am listening to the radio programme but my internet shaking, i love hearing God words and i want a prayer for my life because am a footballer and i want to succeed in it. Thanks and God bless.

    Like

  44. Niklas,
    I enjoyed listening to your Wednesday program on the re-broadcast, wish I could catch it live. I heard you say if you have any question leave it on the web and you would answer. Here is my question and it may sound silly to some, ” If your loved one died and went to heaven would they be able to look down on you?” i believe they could not because it would be tortures not being able to help your loved one. Is there anywhere in the bible that answers this question?
    Bill

    Like

  45. Hi Mr. Arthur,

    I’m a subscrber, and would like to watch one of your protected videos. How can I get the permission?

    Like

  46. Dear Brother Nicklas:
    I listened to your exegesis in the book of Lamentations today, and about midpoint of the first half
    hour you made the remark that you didn’t believe in “once saved, always saved!” and that a person
    could actually walk away from the Lord once saved. I know you quickly mentioned there are verses
    that say that nothing can take us away from the Lord once you are truly saved. Do you really believe a loving Lord like our God would permit that to happen??? So what you are also saying
    then it is up to person to keep themselves saved??? Are you also then saying that it was really up
    to you whether or not to accept being saved??? I’m sorry brother, but there really seems to be
    something wrong these statements and thinking. The beauty of our salvation is that we had nothing to do with making it happen. It was ALL OF THE LORD, LIKE HAPPENED TO THE APOSTLE PAUL, and no man can take credit for any part of it or any part of undoing it, unless it
    really never happened in the first place. You know I usually really enjoy your candid exegesis of
    the Scriptures, but your position on this issue has really given cause for serious doubt!!!! Spoken
    with the love of our Saviour the Lord Jesus Christ!!

    Brother Michael Donohue

    Like

    1. Being confident of this very thing, that he which hath begun a good work in you will perform it until the day of Jesus Christ: PHP 1:6

      Like

    2. Brother Michael, I understand the dilemma and even agree with you, however there may be those who falsely appear to be saved to even themselves as well as others, that would be my point.

      Like

    3. Here is your answer Brother MichaelHebrews Chapter 6

      4 For it is impossible for those who were once enlightened, and have tasted of the heavenly gift, and were made partakers of the Holy Ghost,

      5 And have tasted the good word of God, and the powers of the world to come,

      6 If they shall fall away, to renew them again unto repentance; seeing they crucify to themselves the Son of God afresh, and put him to an open shame.

      Like

  47. Not sure if you’ve talked about this before Nicklas and wanted to get your thoughts. I ask a friend how many trumps have already sounded and got the following reply. Based on hs understanding we just waiting for the last trump:

    The seven are noted as the War Trumpets

    4 trumpet have sounded, applying to the breakup of the roman empire
    1 through 6 coincide the vision of Daniel
    5 and 6 sounded when judgement came to the eastern half of the Roman Empire and to remember that it was the last empire of Daniels vision, Thus the seventh will sound as 7 is completeness and gives us the full victory of Jesus Christ over all the opposition.

    Trumpet 7 is completeness leaning on #8 no trumpet but the new beginning as Christ is victorious

    This is the general historic interpretation.

    Like

  48. The Mark of the Beast cannot be the Social Security number. There are a lot of obvious resons that this is so, … Truth be told, Sunday worship DOES fit with the prophecies perfectly. …

    Like

    1. The opposite of what you say is true. If one must have the number to “buy, sell or trade” – that makes it an economic mark, not a worship day mark. The sunday worship doctrine is based solely on conjecture, a trademark of SDA.

      Like

  49. i know what kind of a reply i’ll get but that’s ok. i know this world isn’t my home. i’m glad it’s not Heaven. i’m glad that North America[the USA & Canada] isn’t Heaven otherwise i wouldn’t wanna leave it. i’d turn into a pillar of salt for looking back that’s for sure. i pray however, that God will allow America & Canada to become 2 safe havens for Bible believing born again Christians that will be fleeing the coming persecution & martyrdom from across the globe. maybe it’s too much of a pipedream. if that’s the case then sobeit. the safest place will always be right at the center of God’s will.

    Like

  50. Hi Nicklas,

    I just recently picked up your show again, and I’m enjoying listening to some of your older studies. (mainly the study you did on book of revelations.) audio 7A I believe you made a comment about the book of enoch and how its a fictional book. I’m trying to start my own research (Lord willing) on wether it is or not, and wanted to know if you had any insight on this topic that could help in the research.

    Thanx

    Like

    1. It was so long ago that I looked into it and came to the conclusion that it is a pseudo biblical work in keeping with the gnostic gospels etc. and not of the Enoch of the OT that I don’t have anything at hand, but would be interested in what you find.

      Like

  51. Hello Nicklas
    I recently came across your teachings on sermonaudio and I am interested in listening to more videos, how can I?

    Like

  52. Hi Nicklas.
    I have recently found your radio show…and became a quick listener to first amendment radio. I am listening to your show, and over heard you speaking about the 36pg study of the name of God. it would be nice to read up on that… so here’s your inspiration!

    Like

  53. Hi Nicklas.
    Just wondering, what ever happened to Randy Lee (Matters concerning His Lawful assembly)?
    Do you have any current contact info for him?
    Thanks.
    Jim

    Like

  54. Hi Nicklas, I have had the pleasure of listening to some of your shows recently. I usually tune in to Al Adask’s show particularly on Wednesday nights. I am one of several who have been working on Dennis Craig’s documents. There have been some recent discoveries involving some errors in the docs. We had mentioned it to Dennis and Al, but as you may have heard from last night’s show, it is quite apparent to us that Dennis has placed himself in a very peculiar situation. It actually seems that Dennis has possibly, with malice, placed so-called traps in his docs. We don’t believe that. We believe he had made some errors, and rather than admitting so, he decided to go another route. We are not 100% convinced that this were his true intentions, but it’s very difficult to come to another conclusion. Having said all this, I happened to notice recently a response from you to him(Dennis) on Al’s website, along with the grace that you showed by sharing your travel document, Thank you very much for that btw! My question to you, if you don’t mind sharing is, have you been harrassed by the “polic-e enforcers” while utilizing this approach? Thank you very much Nicklas for voicing your thoughts, they are most welcome, and Lord bless you and yours, ken.

    Like

    1. Brother Ken, Last time I did get stopped, about 7 years ago, I got the distinct feeling that the CHP officer was very convicted, and though I was actually exceeding the speed limit quite unintentionally, he simply asked me to be more careful next time and let me go at that. They dont really bother me and I dont give them any reason to, I travel at the suggested speed and even wear the lap belt, because I dont want them to be offended-I believe that The Word of God requires me to comply with their rules as long as their rules do not require me to break the Law of His Kingdom.
      These scriptures convey the mode by which I travel in the world:
      (Psa 17:8) Keep me as the apple of the eye, hide me under the shadow of thy wings,
      (Psa 36:7) How excellent [is] thy lovingkindness, O God! therefore the children of men put their trust under the shadow of thy wings.
      (Psa 57:1) Be merciful unto me, O God, be merciful unto me: for my soul trusteth in thee: yea, in the shadow of thy wings will I make my refuge,
      (Psa 63:7) Because thou hast been my help, therefore in the shadow of thy wings will I rejoice.
      I have found a hiding place, and it is in plain site.
      (Psa 32:7) Thou [art] my hiding place; thou shalt preserve me from trouble; thou shalt compass me about with songs of deliverance. Selah.
      He is faithful to those who fear Him and keep His Commanments….. \o/ HaleluYah \o/

      Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Biblical Studies