…But this apostasy was to have a head, and the coming and character of that head are the great subject of Paul’s Thessalonian prophecy. A mistaken apprehension of his first letter to them had led the Thessalonians to expect an immediate advent of Christ, and in his second epistle Paul sets himself to correct this error by further instruction as to the future. He tells them of something that was destined to precede the return of Christ, a great apostasy, which would reach its climax in the manifestation of a certain mighty power of evil ; to which he attaches three names, and of which he gives many particulars similar to those which Daniel gave of his “little horn,” such as the place and time of its origin, its nature, sphere, character, conduct, and doom.
The names which the apostle gives to this head of the apostasy in this prophecy are “that man of sin, . . . the son of perdition,” and “that wicked” or “lawless” one. These expressions might convey to the mind of superficial readers the idea that the predicted head of the apostasy would be an individual. Careful study however shows this to be a false impression an impression for which there is no solid foundation in the passage. The expressions themselves, when analysed grammatically, are seen to bear another signification quite as well, if not better, and the context demands that they be understood in a dynastic sense. “The man of sin,” like “the man of God,” has a broad, extended meaning. When we read “that the man of God may be perfect, throughly furnished unto all good works/’ we do not suppose it means any one individual man, although it has the definite article. It indicates a whole class of men of a certain character, succession of similar individuals. The use of the ^definite article (analogous to the omission of the article in Greek) does indeed limit an expression of the kind. A man of sin could be only one, just as a king of England could mean only an individual. The king, on the other hand, may include a whole dynasty. A king has but the life of an individual, the king never dies. When, in speaking of the Jewish tabernacle in Hebrews, Paul says that into the holiest of all ” went the high priest alone once every year,” he includes the entire succession of the high priests of Israel. That a singular expression in a prophecy may find its fulfilment in a plurality of individuals is perfectly clear from John’s words, ” As ye have heard that antichrist shall come, even so now are there many antichrists”
Any doubt or ambiguity as to the true force of the expression ” the man of sin ” is however removed by a consideration of the context of this passage. Grammatically it may mean either an individual or a succession of similar individuals. The context determines that it actually does mean the latter. ” The mystery of iniquity,” in which this man of sin was latent, was already working in Paul’s day. The apostasy out of which he was to grow was already in existence. ” The mystery of iniquity doth already work.” The man of sin, on the other hand, was to continue till the second advent of Christ, which is still future ; for he is destroyed, as it is distinctly stated, only by the brightness of the epiphany.
This article is a excerpt from the book: Romanism and the Reformation by H. Grattan Guinness go to pt.2
see related article The Restrainer
Walk in the Spirit and be led by the Spirit, our Creator calls His Elect to obey to His commandments, allow His Holy Spirit to bring forth the fruit of repentance in your life, “the good works which God has before ordained that we might walk in them.” If you cannot obey Him now, how do you think He will lead you when the time is critical? Learn to trust and obey Him now and you will be able to hear and obey Him through this Global Great Depression, coming world conflicts and Mark of the Beast Inquisition. Cross the Border into His Kingdom, obey the King and live forever, nothing is more important!
But woe unto you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites! for ye shut up the kingdom of heaven against men: for ye neither go in yourselves, neither suffer ye them that are entering to go in. (Mat 23:13)
8 thoughts on “The Man of Sin – H. Grattan Guinness”
Reblogged this on Uncontrolled Opposition and commented:
A very clear explanation of who the antichrist is. The correlation of the ‘man of God’ (all true believers) and ‘the man of sin’ (all unbelievers) perfectly demonstrates that the antichrist is not an individual but spirit comprised of those who reject Christ.
Update. Thess 2:3-5 3 Let no man deceive you by any means:for that day shall not come, except there come a falling away first, and that man of sin be revealed, the son of perdition; 4 Who opposeth and exalteth himself above all that is called God, or that is worshipped; so that he as God sitteth in the temple of God, shewing himself that he is God.
There is a spirit of antichrist which are the ungodly which there were many in John’s day as show in 1 John 2:18. But John also clarifies the antichirst as an individual who will come at the end time on the same verse.
(1 John 2:18) “Little children, it is the last time: and as ye have heard that antichrist shall come, even now are there many antichrists; whereby we know that it is the last time.”
So John clearly states, antichrist in the singular and plural. As did Paul in 2 Thess 2:3-5. “Let no man (singular) deceive you by any means…!
Thank you for your study on man of sin. Just curious, Nicklas, are you a seventh day adventist??
no I am not SDA, I am a bible believing protestant, historicist
Thanks for clarification:) I am as well. Thank you for your work:)
Yes thanks again for this post, “Romanism and the Reformation” by Henry Grattan Guinness should be a household word. Yes he makes it real clear who the “The Man of Sin” where he is located and takes all doubt away who the Biblical, historical, and prophetic anti-christ.
Understand the busy and I will follow the rules you have given. God Bless and keep on keeping on!!!
Thank you for this. Without question it is a revelation indeed!